Button Generator by Vista-Buttons.com v4.3.0
Our Facebook Page

"A nuclear power plant, while the least-favored type of power plant, would still be preferable to a landfill, a casino, or an aggregate quarry."

It's one of the first questions you ask when you hear someone wants to build a casino somewhere near you: What's it going to do to my property value?

Sure, some people will insist that a casino is a desirable neighbor, but the fact remains, few property owners actually want to live near one.

Most people understand that, at the very least, a casino operates 24/7 and will lead to an increase in crime, traffic congestion, drunken drivers, trash, tour buses and road noise - and that these things will be ultimately reflected in a reduction in property values.

Including Steve Crosby, chairman of the Mass Gaming Commission, who admitted that even he wouldn't want to live "too close" to a casino - citing property values as a reason.

Smart move.

A 2013 study by economists at the National Association of Realtors at the request of the Realtor Association of Pioneer Valley concluded that the impact of casinos was "unambiguously negative" on a housing market.

The study's economists also estimate that there will also be 125 additional home foreclosures each year, representing $5 million in lost home values.

The study calculated that:

A casino would sap 1.1 to 2.3 percent of home values in the host community. In Palmer, Springfield and West Springfield, where casino companies are vying for the lone Western Massachusetts license, that works out to $64 million to $128 million in lost home value.

In North Stonington, CT, the town next door to Ledyard, home to the Foxwoods ever-expanding mega casino...

Residential homes on main road or alternate roads leading to casinos tend to decrease in value 10 percent. Making it harder to sell and reducing the tax basis for the area.

- Source: Casino Impacts on North Stonington
Prepared by North Stonington Board of Selectmen; Nicholas H. Mullane, II
William N. Peterson; John M. Turner
Amended December 24, 2001

In Preston, another abutting town...

The impact traffic increase has had on home values in Preston is dramatic. A recent revaluation of properties in Preston as shown home values for properties within a quarter mile of a state road are as much as (20 %) twenty percent lower than a similar home that is not close t the traffic of the casino. The financial impact for Preston homeowners is approximately $6,000,000.00.

- Source: Casino Related Impacts on Preston, CT
Prepared by: Preston Board of Selectman; Robert Congdon, First Selectman
Gerald Grabarek, Selectman; Thomas Maurer, Selectman
: December 18, 2001

These are real estate impacts that are directly associated with the presence of a casino in an abutting town - not even the host community - almost a decade after the casino was built.

The cost of crime resulting from casinos, as reflected in unrealised assessed real estate valuation, appears to be on average $5.2m per square mile in 1986 (current prices) in the South Jersey area. For an average community in the area it would amount in 1986 to a total of approximately $105m.

Op-Ed: Casino would be detrimental to area housing market
The Sun Chronicle
March 11, 2012

To the editor: I'm a Foxboro resident and owner of a real estate brokerage for the last 23 years. I'm against the casino in Foxboro for several reasons.

* A casino is controversial.

* Anything controversial will cause some home buyers to exclude Foxboro and surrounding towns. This potential reduction in buyers will negatively affect the price and resale of homes here.

* There will most likely be an increase in crime, drunk driving and other problems that don't necessarily come from other types of commercial developments such as a malls, restaurants, etc.

* The majority of jobs created by a casino are not high paying. In contrast, jobs created through skilled manufacturing, high tech, research, medical, education and finance would be more beneficial to Foxboro and area communities. Whether the casino is built in Foxboro or Boston, those same jobs the casino lobby is promoting will be available for applicants.

* A casino will change the demographics and feel of the town. The casino developer is setting aside funds to deal with the increased need in law enforcement the casino will bring. Many families moved to Foxboro because of the community feel. Any significant change in crime, drug abuse, alcohol abuse and, domestic violence, or any other demographics will change the feel and fabric of Foxboro and surrounding towns.

Three casinos will be built in Massachusetts, all within a drive convenient to Foxboro residents who want to use it or work there; it doesn't need to be in Foxboro for this to happen.

With objection from of town officials and residents in significant numbers, Steve Wynn and Robert Kraft have resorted to employment of people from outside of town to try to sell the proposal to residents. They are funding promotions trying to make the casino just about jobs. This argument falls short because Foxboro has relatively high employment. All the casino jobs will be available to qualified candidates no matter where the casino is built. The "Jobs for Foxboro" argument just doesn't hold water.

Bob Simone, Foxboro

Middleboro developer says casino talk hurting business
October 17, 2007

"MIDDLEBORO - A local developer says his business is being negatively affected by a proposed casino in Middleboro and is seeking tax relief from the town..."